News coverage of violence emerges alternatively as an instrument with the potential to be strategically exploited for diverse political, ideological, and commercial purposes. Drawing on forty-three in-depth interviews, the accounts of these individuals confirm the need to move beyond deterministic approaches suggested by the protest paradigm, acknowledging that the mediated visibility of violence does neither invariably lead to support for the status quo nor to a demonization of social unrest. Focusing on the June 2013 protests in Brazil, this article takes the discussion in a different conceptual and empirical direction, examining the forces that, according to national, alternative, and foreign journalists, shaped the coverage of violence during those demonstrations. Studies examining protest news coverage often look at it through a “protest paradigm,” arguing that “mainstream” media delegitimize protests by emphasizing violence and marginalizing grievances. ![]() However, BP and Mídia Ninja established closer ties after 2016, when they allied in defence of President Initially, BP actors were mostly suspicious both of Mídia Ninja's unmediated journalistic methods and its political agenda, as they were sceptical or even critical of the Jornadas de Junho's political intentions and impact. Mídia Ninja -Ninja is an acronym for Narrativas Independentes, Jornalismo e Ação (Independent Narratives Journalism and Action) -is a collaborative journalism project providing live coverage of protests through the use of cell phones, which gained momentum during the Jornadas de Junho in 201 when activists in their coverage provided live testimonies of police brutality (Cammaerts and Jiménez-Martinez 2014 Penteado and Souza 2016). Two particularly relevant cases refer to Mídia Ninja and Intercept Brasil. A particularly relevant case refers to other leftist activist media organisations that differ from BP in their political and organisational approaches. The third level refers to agents that do not belong formally to the BP universe, but establish some tactical alliances with it, motivated by common interests or sensibilities. Many of them joined BP later and do not use blogs but have social media accounts on Twitter, Facebook, Instagram and other platorms that they use to echo BP's content. The second level refers to other actors identifying themselves as members of BP. ![]() Their prestige allows their posts to be shared with a wider range of people than others. The central position in the system is occupied by prestigious journalists and activists, in most cases belonging to BP's first generation (Magalhães and Albuquerque 2017). BP Network in Facebook This logic results in a hierarchical model of organisation.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |